Welcome, visitor! [ Login

 

Diabetes & Prediabetes Tests

  • Listed: July 18, 2024 11:22 pm
  • Expires: 97551 days, 18 hours

Description

This fact sheet compares the following tests:

  • A1C test
  • fasting plasma glucose (FPG) test
  • oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)
  • random plasma glucose (RPG) test

Confirming Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes

Diagnosis must be confirmed unless symptoms are present. Repeat the test using one of the following methods:

  • Repeat the same test on a different day—preferred.
  • If two different tests are used—e.g., FPG and A1C—and both indicate diabetes, consider the diagnosis confirmed.
  • If the two different tests are discordant, repeat the test that is above the diagnostic cut point.

If diagnosis cannot be confirmed using the results of two tests, but at least one test indicates high risk, health care providers may wish to follow the patient closely and retest in 3 to 6 months.1

A doctor, nurse, and technician review test results in a clinic.

Interpreting Laboratory Results

When interpreting laboratory results health care providers should

  • consider that all laboratory test results represent a range, rather than an exact number2
  • be informed about the A1C assay methods used by their laboratory2
  • send blood samples for diagnosis to a laboratory that uses an NGSP-certified method for A1C analysis to ensure the results are standardized3
  • consider the possibility of interference in the A1C test when a result is above 15% or is at odds with other diabetes test results1
  • consider each patient’s profile, including risk factors and history, and individualize diagnosis and treatment decisions in discussion with the patient1

Comparing Diabetes Blood Tests

View the content below as a table in the PDF Version (460 KB) .

A1C Test

Uses:

  • Screening and diagnosis of prediabetes
    • 5.7–6.4%
  • Screening and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
    • ≥ 6.5%
    • repeat for confirmation of diagnosis
  • Monitoring of diabetes

Technical Features:

  • Diagnosis requires a laboratory test certified by the NGSP, not meter—point-of-care A1C tests are only suitable for monitoring
  • Sample any time of day, no fasting
  • Sample: anticoagulated whole blood
  • Sample stability: superior
  • Sensitivity: less than the FPG test and the OGTT
  • Coefficient of variation: assay variability, see www.ngsp.org
A semicircular dial showing the range of variability in the A1C test can be 0.5 percent for some methods.
Courtesy of David Aron, M.D., Louis Stokes Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center

With a coefficient of variation as large as that allowed by the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program, a reported A1C result of 7.0% could indicate a true A1C of anywhere from ~6.5 to 7.5%.

Pros:

  • Reflects long-term blood glucose concentration
  • Unaffected by acute changes in glucose levels due to stress or illness
  • Highly correlated with risks for complications such as retinopathy and cardiovascular disease (CVD)
  • Convenient for patient and health care providers
  • Most stable sample after collection
  • Low within-patient variability
  • Established international standardization of lab tests
  • Accuracy of test is monitored

Cons:

  • Lower sensitivity: identifies fewer cases of diabetes than the glucose tests
  • Interference resulting in falsely increased or lowered results due to*
    • genetic variants including HbS, HbC, HbD, and HbE traits and HbF:** affects people of African, Mediterranean, and Southeast Asian heritage
    • kidney disease
    • liver disease
    • iron deficiency anemia
    • heavy bleeding
  • Not recommended for rapidly progressing diabetes, e.g., type 1 diabetes in children
  • May not be available in some laboratories/areas of the world
  • Expensive

FPG Test

Uses:

  • Screening and diagnosis of prediabetes or impaired fasting glucose (IFG)
    • 100–125 mg/dL
  • Screening and diagnosis of diabetes
    • ≥126 mg/dL
    • repeat for confirmation of diagnosis

Technical Features:

  • Diagnosis requires a laboratory test, not meter
  • Sample in morning, after 8-hour fast
  • Sample: sodium fluoride plasma preferred
  • Sample stability: low—requires processing within 30 minutes
  • Sensitivity: greater than the A1C test, less than the OGTT
  • Coefficient of variation: assay variability:
A semicircular dial showing the range of variability in the fasting plasma glucose test can be 5.7 percent.
Courtesy of David Aron, M.D., Louis Stokes Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center

With a coefficient of variation 5.7% (typical biological variation within the same person), an FPG test result of 126 mg/dL could indicate a true FPG of anywhere from ~110 to 142 mg/dL.

Pros:

  • Low cost
  • Assay is widely available
  • Assay is automated

Cons:

  • Indicates single-point blood glucose level
  • Affected by short-term lifestyle changes: stress or illness
  • Less tightly linked to diabetes complications than A1C
  • Not convenient for patient or health care provider: requires fasting and scheduling a morning appointment or return visit
  • Diurnal variation
  • Sample not stable after collection
  • High within-patient variability
  • Many laboratories measure serum, which is not recommended
  • Inadequate standardization of assays

OGTT

Uses:

  • Screening and diagnosis of prediabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)
    • 140–199 mg/dL at 2 hr.
  • Screening and diagnosis of diabetes
    • ≥200 mg/dL at 2 hr.
    • repeat for confirmation of diagnosis
  • Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)*

Technical Features:

  • Sample in morning, after 8-hr. fast and 2 hrs. after glucose load
  • Sample stability: low—requires processing within 30 minutes
  • Patients should ingest at least 150 g/day of carbohydrates for 3 days prior
  • Sensitivity: greater than the A1C or the FPG tests
  • Range of variability: 16.7%

Pros:

  • Sensitive indicator of risk of developing diabetes
  • Early marker of impaired glucose balance

Cons:

  • Affected by short-term lifestyle changes: stress, illness, and medications
  • Not convenient for patient or health care provider: requires fasting and scheduling a morning appointment or return visit
  • Extensive patient preparation
  • Sample not stable after collection
  • High within-patient variability
  • Low reproducibility
  • Expensive

RPG Test

Uses:

  • Diagnosis of diabetes—used only with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis:
    • polyuria, polydypsia, and unexplained weight loss
    • 200 mg/dL

Technical Features:

  • Sample any time, no fasting
  • Sample stability: low—requires processing in fewer than 2 hours

Pros:

  • Convenient
  • Part of basic metabolic panel screen

Cons:

  • Indicates single-point blood glucose level
  • Used only in symptomatic patients, not recommended for screening
  • Insensitive measurement
  • Greater within-patient variability
  • Affected by short-term lifestyle changes and prandial state

Comparing Diagnoses

In some people, a blood glucose test may indicate a diagnosis of diabetes even though an A1C test does not.

The reverse can also occur—an A1C test may indicate a diagnosis of diabetes even though a blood glucose test does not.

Because of these variations in test results, health care providers should repeat tests before making a diagnosis. People with differing test results may be in an early stage of the disease, where blood glucose levels have not risen high enough to show on every test.

References

No Tags

2761 total views, 1 today

  

Listing ID: 1985aa5a6beae9e6

Report problem

Processing your request, Please wait....

Sponsored Links